Re: [PERDITION-USERS] Question about disabling PAM

On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 05:54:45PM +0200, Joachim Sehlstedt wrote: Good idea, can you try this patch? # HG changeset patch # User Simon Horman <horms(a)verge.net.au> # Date 1280117159 -32400 # Node ID fd01f6ec07d8967624e6c5dea9d69ec40320b531 # Parent e2c76d67a58540aca50465a160b81488044d2eb1 configure: Add --disable-pam As requested by Joachim Sehlstedt <uk(a)newstyledata.net> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms(a)verge.net.au> diff -r e2c76d67a585 -r fd01f6ec07d8 configure.ac --- a/configure.ac Sat Jul 24 14:45:18 2010 +0900 +++ b/configure.ac Mon Jul 26 13:05:59 2010 +0900 @@ -884,7 +884,24 @@ ###################################################################### # PAM -pam=yes +AC_MSG_CHECKING([if PAM support has been disabled]); +AC_ARG_ENABLE( + pam, + [ --disable-pam DO not compile with pam support. ], + [ + if test "$enable_pam" = "no"; then + AC_MSG_RESULT("yes") + else + AC_MSG_RESULT("no") + fi + ], + [ + enable_pam="yes"; + AC_MSG_RESULT("no") + ] +) + +if test "$enable_pam" == "yes"; then AC_CHECK_HEADERS( security/pam_appl.h, true, @@ -899,8 +916,9 @@ sleep 5 ] ) +fi -if test $pam = yes; then +if test "$enable_pam" == "yes"; then AC_CHECK_HEADERS(security/pam_misc.h) AC_CHECK_LIB( @@ -921,14 +939,14 @@ ) fi -if test "$pam" = "yes"; then +if test "$enable_pam" == "yes"; then pam_lib="-lpam" AC_DEFINE(WITH_PAM_SUPPORT, 1, Compile with PAM support) else pam_lib="" fi -AM_CONDITIONAL(PAM_BUILD, test "$pam" = "yes") +AM_CONDITIONAL(PAM_BUILD, test "$enable_pam" = "yes") posix_regex_libs="-lvanessa_logger -lvanessa_adt"