9 Sep
2010
9 Sep
'10
2:17 p.m.
hi,
are there any issues when using imapproxyd in front of a perdition server?
thx
matthias
10 Sep
10 Sep
1:32 a.m.
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 04:17:03PM +0200, Matthias Leopold wrote:
hi,
are there any issues when using imapproxyd in front of a perdition server?
Hi,
I'm not aware of any issues reported here or elsewhere,
but I also don't have any first hand experience of that combination.
6:47 a.m.
Hi.
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 16:17 +0200, Matthias Leopold wrote:
hi,
are there any issues when using imapproxyd in front of a perdition server?
thx
matthias
It should work fine, I used the combination for several years in a quite
busy environment (up to thousands of simultaneous sessions) without any
problems.
Best regards,
Janne Pikkarainen
8:36 a.m.
On 10/09/2010 07:47, Janne Pikkarainen wrote:
Hi.
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 16:17 +0200, Matthias Leopold wrote:
> hi,
>
> are there any issues when using imapproxyd in front of a perdition server?
That's what we're running now for our webmail service and there are no
issues that we've encountered.
Jon.
3:20 p.m.
Hi.
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 16:17 +0200, Matthias Leopold wrote:
We've been using this combination for years, too, on four webmail systems,
each having over a thousand simultaneous connects.
hi,
are there any issues when using imapproxyd in front of a perdition server?
thx
matthias
It should work fine, I used the combination for several years in a quite
busy environment (up to thousands of simultaneous sessions) without any
problems. Best regards,
Janne Pikkarainen
--
scott hollatz net shollatz(a)d.UMn.eDu
information technology systems and services tel +1 218 726 8851
university of minnesota duluth mn usa fax +1 218 726 7674
--
"Asn aD ta zlAp em uT zt33rg"
5069
days inactive
5070
days old
4 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Janne Pikkarainen -
Jonathan Knight -
Matthias Leopold -
scott hollatz -
Simon Horman